BY CHERI RAE
As the co-author of the guidebook, “Walk Santa Barbara,” I once wrote, “…Santa Barbara is one of the nation’s most walkable cities. In fact, Santa Barbara is more pedestrian-friendly than most Euro-towns and lacks only international signage and some imaginative civic promotion to become one of the world’s great walking destinations.”
Today it’s a different time, a different place.
As a consultant for an upscale British walking company that once offered a four-day walking vacation in Santa Barbara, I’ve had plenty of experience squiring well-heeled walkers around town. These folks, who traveled from different states, even different countries to enjoy Santa Barbara on foot, invariably appreciated local architecture, neighborhoods, beaches and trails. But when it came time to take the requisite walk downtown, even though I led them through what’s left of the once-graceful paseo system, almost to a person these walkers were appalled. Their most common observation was some variation on, “State Street could be so nice if it weren’t for the traffic. All these cars destroy the ambience.”
Their comments invariably launched impassioned comparisons and discussions about wonderful walkable cities and towns with thriving commercial districts, sidewalk cafes, street performers and a relaxed pace focused on human—not vehicular—activity. Think Florence, Siena, Salzburg, and closer to home, think Portland, Boulder, Seattle, and Santa Fe. Just a hundred miles away, think Santa Monica’s Third Street Promenade.
Actually, for a few hours on a few blocks every Tuesday, during the weekly Farmer’s Market, we can experience just how State Street’s typical auto-centric frenzy is transformed into a pedestrian-friendly destination. A quiet, gentle spirit settles in, and a relaxed atmosphere prevails. All too soon, it’s over and the cars reign once more.
Santa Barbara attracts an enormous number of visitors, especially on weekends; so many drivers and pedestrians on State Street are unfamiliar with the place. Drivers may become easily distracted by missing a turn, or trying to figure out directions to where they’re going. Pedestrians may miscalculate their feeling of security, particularly when engaged in conversation. Accidents happen when confusion enters the scene.
At a time when this city has become obsessed with high-density, “mixed-use” development downtown, and so-called “traffic calming” in certain neighborhoods—but ignoring it in others—downtown traffic feels more congested and more dangerous than ever. In view of the tragic pedestrian-vehicle accident last weekend when many lives were shattered in a split second, it’s time again to re-think the State Street weekend traffic jam and close the street to cars from Victoria Street to Cabrillo Boulevard.
I know all the arguments: the merchants want the traffic; they think it’s good for business. That might have held up when mom-and-pop shops lined our city’s main shopping street, with on-street parking available in front of them. But with our numerous parking garages accessible only by the one-way streets parallel to State, today’s chain store proprietors cannot make that claim sound credible.
Then there’s the argument that the bumper-to-bumper weekend traffic from downtown to the beach is somehow lively and vibrant. I frankly don’t quite get the appeal of thumping rap, the scent of exhaust, or the revving of engines, especially when attempting a quiet conversation or trying to enjoy the aromas and flavors of a pricey meal at a sidewalk cafe.
I’d say the safety issue trumps both of these concerns. As one who often walks downtown during the week for meetings or to run errands, I’m more familiar than I want to be with the bad driving behavior and poor pedestrian habits on display on our ever-busier main street: Drivers talking on cell phones, making illegal left turns or impatient right turns; pedestrians jaywalking, darting into the street and crossing on a red light evidently believing they’re invincible, or simply loping along, tuned into the I-Pod instead of the street scene.
It’s time to separate walkers, shoppers and diners from cars on State Street. We can open it to pedestrians, bicyclists and our electric trolleys to allow mobility for those who don’t want to—or can’t—walk the distance. And park the cars in the lavish structures created just for that purpose. Our busiest street needs some real “traffic calming,” and our pedestrians need protection.
Questions? Comments? E-mail Cheri at letters@santabarbarafree.com.
Thursday, October 4, 2007
The power of pedestrians
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Just a week ago, following many months of off-and-on casual discussions, the Santa Barbara City Transport and Circulation Committee (advisers to City Council) requested that a future meeting agenda soon, such as October 25th, should include a discussion about the feasibility of closing a portion of Lower State Street to motor vehicle traffic, either permanent or temporary.
A concept to close the street to cars has been going around for months if not years, and this commentary column today by Cheri Rae highlights some of the usual issues.
Variables to consider for scoping out such a project include:
* which blocks of Lower State Street would be considered,
* how motor vehicle traffic would circulate onto Chapala St. and Anacapa St. instead,
* how cross-street traffic may circulate better with no mid-intersection blockages by drivers illegally stopping in the middle of the intersections,
* speedier access by the State St. shuttle bus as an allowed vehicle along State St.,
* increases to frontage businesses if people linger longer in a more pleasant experience and spend more money,
* access possible by delivery vehicles, taxis, police, etc. that still would be an effective street project,
* models from similar closed streets, such as Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica and elsewhere,
* exact locations and durations, such as only some days or nights,
* and no doubt much more....
The weekly Tuesday Farmers Market closes State Street one night a week, and the City Still Stands and thrives. A distinct advantage here for Lower State St. is that no car parking exists there, so no car parking capacity would be lost.
The only function much of the time seems to be gaper cruising that may be nice for the cruisers but for everyone else is an experience indeed dominated by thumping rap, exhaust fumes, and noisy engines, as Rae notes.
Such an action naturally would need careful scoping of the potential advantages and disadvantages, but it needs to start somewhere. The City Transport Committee, comprised of real people who volunteer their time and expertise, is ready to start enabling that discussion.
To anyone that is listening:
I am a 27 yr old local female. I attended La Colina and San Marcos High School. I am very familiar with walking around Santa Barbara especially since I no longer drive a car for financial and personal reasons.
I was hit by a motor vehicle in December of 2006 while crossing a street I have crossed countless times. The location was at State and Ortega. I was hit by a drunk driver but before I crossed I made sure the coast was clear by checking and double checking as usual.
I recently saw on the cover of the Newspress that an out-of-town mother and her 2 children where also hit at State and Carrillo. How frightenening for them and their loved ones who sat at home or raced to SB feeling helpess and concerns about medical bills and any other traumatic thoughts that come with the territory.
This made me wonder, how often are people beeing hit and is there anyone out there doing anything about this situation.
I don't think people realize that short of a death there are still many people that are becoming disabled and having their healthy youthful lives being put in the hands of the reckless drivers in Santa Barbara. I constantly notice reckless drivers all over the place and I am ready for someone to be accountable. How can I get involved?
Thanks for your story, K. Macabio.
Besides getting your news from Daily Sound instead of the Newsmess, you could nudge the City along to address your concern by speaking to the City Council next or any Tuesday at 2 pm, during the Public Comment period. That is a start.
Not a total resolution, but a start.
First time I visited State Street many years ago it had 4 lanes, a narrow sidewalk, and I parked on the street.
It was *way* less pedestrian friendly than it is now.
Everywhere I've lived high density development has encouraged walking.
I think closing off State Street would be a good idea, but I think Cheri Rae gets a bit eccentric in her exaggerations too.
"Almost to a person, these walkers were appalled"?
Really, Cheri? Appalled???
I feel like you are either lying through your teeth in order to come up with a good "story" or else the "focus group" you were guiding has been breathing their rarified air too long to remember what the real urban, living world -- at street level as it were -- is like.
I'm not wholly opposed to turning part of State Street into a pedestrian zone, though I'm not sure that such a "Disneyfication" is necessarily the best thing for our city. However, repeated claims that downtown has been "ruined" or turned into a walker's nightmare are the type of hyperbole I cannot stand. I would posit that several legitimate polls of people (both locals and tourists) downtown would find that most of them greatly enjoy the atmosphere and find it far more enjoyable than many municipalities its size.
Frankly, I'm tired of many locals whining about how the city has "gone down the toilet." I'm a non-car-owning, bus-riding, walking resident who's been here almost two decades, and I choose to see the beauty and bliss that can be found here every single day on the downtown streets. It's there -- really, it is -- at least if you want to focus on it.
Likewise, I'll choose to focus on the good things about your piece: the idea of making State Street even more pedestrian friendly and beautiful experience than it already is -- rather than focusing, as I easily could, on the fact that you seem to be yet another shrill voice railing against the "high-density bogeyman" even though some of your examples (Portland, Siena, Salzburg) are arguably far more high-density than SB will ever be.
And one last thing: I'll take State Street as it is over Third Street any day.
I have been walking to work in downtown for about four years now. I have seen at least a dozen people driving the wrong way up and down Santa Barbara and Anacapa streets. The streets can be confusing, I understand, but what is disturbing is the lack of awareness of surroundings most drivers display. I have had over two dozen very close calls with drivers not paying attention. Actually, most of these close calls have happened right outside the parks between Sola and Arrelaga, where a driver should be on the lookout for pepole walking. One day, after a paticularly frightening encounter where the driver never saw me, I decided I would start profiling the people that nearly ran me down for lack of care. So I made table, M or W, age groups, on the phone or not. I have 22 months of data. Exactly 75% of near misses have been at the hands of a woman between 30 and 50 talking on her cell phone. 1/3 of them had a child somewher in the car. I just thought I would share this with those commenting here about the safety of the streets. It seems that our local mothers are the biggest threat to pedestrian safety here. A little of topic, but it has really gotten under my skin lately.
I can't wait to hear the reasoning the city will come up with as to why closing state street is a bad idea. The word indefensible comes to mind
When I drive my 1.5 mile route to work I make it a game to look for the wrong-way driver that I KNOW is out there. It is a RARE day when I do not see one. And the people dashing across streets, jay-walking with children in tow, astonish me. It is a Driver Training exercise to commute in this town! I thoroughly applaud the idea of closing State Street to vehicles. We have watched over the last 30 years as most of the authentic locally owned businesses have been replaced by chain replicas, until all we have left to make us unique are the Taco Bell architectural code oddities. Taking cars off State and letting restaurants expand their outdoor seating would go a long way toward taking advantage of our unique climate and celebrating what should be our unique spirit.
Dear Neighbors,
I know there's a down side to it, but there would be far more positives to closing State Street to all but delivery trucks and disabled drivers.
During the times it has been closed for special events, it's just glorious.
For those who haven't tried this, I urge you to ride a bicycle or take the MTD downtown rather than using your car and experience what it's like to not struggle for parking.
Santa Barbara, in many ways, keeps getting better and better. A pedestrian-centric State Street is relatively easy change that could make us better still.
And don't forget, around 1/3rd of the population doesn't drive. The adults who don't drive pay a lot to subsidize those of us who do. I think they should demand safer streets. As a father of two non-driving kids, I also demand that we have safer streets.
Thanks for the great article, Leslie.
Don Lubach
doh,
Forgive me. I meant to thank Cheri for the article, I typed "Leslie."
Don
I have walked in cities all over the world - Northern Europe, Southern Europe, South America, Asia, you name it including every city that you list as examples of better walking cities than SB. Santa Barbara, and especially State Street, is one of the best walking environments I've encountered. If you think that State Street is bad you just haven't really been to the places mentioned in your article.
And if you think that traffic is bad now, as you stated, recall how it was 30 years ago with 4 lanes of cars and trucks, 2 lanes of parking, almost no landscaping and narrow sidewalks.
Let's work to improve things, not just keep railing about how bad things have become...
Post a Comment