Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Cold Spring School looks to get overhaul with Measure R 2008

BY COLBY FRAZIER
DAILY SOUND STAFF WRITER

The majority of choices voters will face during the Feb. 5 California primary election consist of big names and big issues.
But for roughly 1,800 Montecito voters, Measure R 2008, which calls for the approval of an $8.75 million general obligation bond to improve facilities at the small Cold Spring School, will be one of those choices.

In order for Measure R to pass, 55 percent of those voters will have to vote yes, and few hope that happens more than Bryan McCabe, superintendent and principal of Cold Spring School.
“It needs to be gutted and cleaned up,” McCabe said of the aging school, much of which was built 80 years ago. “It was a neat little school in 1927, but times have changed.”
During a press conference yesterday at the school, McCabe and Cold Spring School Board of Education members Mike Hieshima and Laura Wyatt outlined what the bond will be used for.
McCabe said the majority of the funds would be used to repair and remodel seven of the school’s oldest classrooms, construct and renovate restrooms, and improve the grass playing field.
About 6,000 square feet of new facilities are also planned, which will include four new classrooms and four new student restrooms, of which only three currently exist.
Wyatt said the grass field has been taken over by gophers and as a result, the school’s annual jog-a-thon can’t be held there.
When it rains, sand from the playground area makes its way onto surrounding pavement, which requires hours of cleanup, and due to traffic on Sycamore Canyon Road, the entrance for the school requires visitors to walk through the school before checking in at the office. McCabe said this constitutes a possible security issue for students.
“It’s getting to the point where it’s broken,” Wyatt said of the school.
Combine these things with what McCabe said are chronically leaking roofs and outdated cabinets and storage space, and you have a ballot measure he believes is a no-brainer for local residents to approve.
But it comes at a cost.
McCabe said homeowners living within the Cold Springs District, which is roughly the western one-third of Montecito, would have to pay $19.70 per every $100,000 of the assessed value of a home.
He said the median assessed value of homes in this area is $650,000, which would translate into an annual payment of about $120 until the bond is paid off.
While that total will greatly increase for a person who bought a home recently for several million dollars, Hieshima said the $19.75 figure, regardless of a home’s assessed value, would make up less than 1 percent of the homeowner’s annual property taxes.
“It’s not a material increase and I think what we get out of it as a community is much better,” McCabe said.
It’s not the first time Cold Spring School has had bond measure on the ballot.
In November 2006, the $14 million Measure K was narrowly defeated after it received only 51 percent of the vote. Hieshima said that measure fell only 50 votes shy of being approved.
He and McCabe said they’re optimistic about Measure R because it’s leaner and will appear on a ballot less riddled with state ballot measures.
After Measure K was defeated, McCabe said board members conducted hearings and asked the public what they would approve.
Wyatt said some of the main things cut from Measure K include a proposed new office building, an expanded auditorium and new playground equipment.
“We really did listen to the community and rearranged,” she said.
McCabe said the only other bond he knows of in the school’s history came in 1996, when voters approved the $2.9 million Measure O, which was used to build five new classrooms and renovate the auditorium.
If voters approve Measure R, McCabe said he’s sure the school can adequately serve Montecito elementary school students for decades to come.
“We’ve identified what Cold Spring School needs to be a state-of-the-art educational facility,” McCabe said.
If the bond is approved, McCabe said renovations should begin this summer and new construction could commence as early as next summer, with all of the projects being completed by late 2009.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

As a neighbor and regular user of the school grounds, I am concerned about the comments coming from the superintendant. In my opinion, the outside grounds of the school have not been maintained..the fields have been overridden by gophers for years, the drinking fountains are rarely cleaned, the outside benches are filthy, and the recent storms moved lots of sand onto the blacktop areas. The jaintors probably have a hard time keeping up with cleaning the interior classrooms, etc. What seems to be needed to start is an improved budget to enhance daily maintenance efforts. Until that is done, I don't see how anyone should approve more funds to build new facilities that will go into disrepair like the existing facilities. I think that the current lack of maintenance is being used as leverage to entice voters to provide more funds. Homeowners in this area are already paying extra for the first bond measure that was passed several years ago. Until I sees a big change in maintenance I won't be voting to approve more funds.

Anonymous said...

I too am a neighbor of Cold Spring School and a regular user of the school grounds. However, I have a somewhat different perspective than anonymous.

Is it possible that anonymous is using the school grounds after school hours or on the weekend? In that case I would hardly hold the maintenance staff responsible for the general upkeep. Personally I have seen many neighbors leave without picking up their trash or without picking up after their dogs.

Does anonymous really think that the current school board and/or superintendent would let the school go into disrepair to entice voters to approve the bond? I believe they are just trying to improve their school for their children and the children after. Yes we are paying for Measure O, kids at the school today are benefiting from those improvements. The updates and improvements from Measure R will benefit the kids today and into the future. Has anonymous ever heard of leaving something better than when you were there?

I do agree that gophers have overridden the field. However, when putting together a school budget does tearing up a field with a gopher problem take priority over major plumbing problems or leaking roofs? Has anonymous ever been to a school board meeting to hear the problems that come with the age of this school and trying to maintain it? In reference to the drinking fountains, is it possible they are so old that they are stained and beyond cleaning? I believe the sand on the blacktop issue was addressed in the article and hopefully will be resolved. As far as the benches go, personally I haven’t had an issue with them being dirty so I don’t feel I can address that.

I would encourage anonymous to contact the school or attend one of the informational meetings prior to voting no.